The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India
did-you-know
Clinical Pearls of JOGI SERIES OF WEBINARS Click her to view
VOL. 59 NUMBER 5 September-October  2009

Primary leiomyosarcoma of the fallopian tube

Shetty Vasanthi ● Shetty Harish ● Shetty Jayaprakash
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Derlakatte - 574 160
  • Download Article
  • Email Article
  • Print Article
  • Whatsapp Article

Keywords : leiomyosarcoma, fallopian tube, subtotal hysterectomy

Introduction

Primary leiomyosarcoma of the fallopian tube is an extremely uncommon neoplasm1. Literature documents only 34 cases of primary uterine tube sarcoma2.

Case report

A 36 year old woman was admitted on 25th October, 2002 with complaints of lower abdominal pain for 15 days, fever for 5 days. Pain was mainly on lower abdomen and was dull aching and continuous in nature. She underwent cesarean section 12 years back and had undergone right sided breast lump excision 8 years back. Her menstrual cycles were irregular over the past 1 year. Abdominal examination revealed a hard lower abdominal mass corresponding to 18 weeks uterine size arising from the pelvis and with restricted mobility. On vaginal examination cervix was posterior and the firm mass was felt through all the fornices. Uterus could not be identified. Transabdominal sonography showed two large solid mass lesions with ascitis. Ultrasound guided aspiration done for cytology showed cluster of cells with features of malignancy.

With a provisional diagnosis of ovarian tumor, laparotomy was done on 7th November, 2002, by a subumbilical midline incision. There were dense omental and interstinal adhesions which were carefully released. After releasing the adhesions two solid masses of about 10 cms. x 8 cms and 8 cms. x 6 cms. were seen. One of the masses had irregular surface and was arising from the left fallopian tube (Figure 1 and 2). The other mass was smooth and adherent to the omentum. Uterus was bulky with one fundal subserous fibroid. There was a secondary deposit in the pouch of Douglas. Left ovary, right tube and ovary were normal. Because of dense adhesions and bleeding subtotal hysterectomy was done along with removal of both the masses, ovaries and tubes. The post operative period was uneventful.



The histopathology report of the mass arising from the left tube showed spindle cells having hyperchromatic nucleus and mitosis more than 10 per 10 high power fields suggestive of leiomyosarcoma of the fallopian tube (Figure 3).


Discussion

Leiomyosarcoma is a cancer of smooth muscle cells. The primary treatment remains surgical excision, although adjunctive chemotherapy and radiation may be of some benefit3. Fallopian tube carcinoma is rarely suspected pre-operatively. The classical triad of symptoms viz. profuse vaginal discharge, pain and adnexal mass, so called “hydrops tubae profluence” first described in 1916 by Latzko, is rarely encountered4. Sarcoma of the fallopian tube is a rarity in gynecologic oncology consisting of < 1% of all genital sarcomas5.

References

  1. Jocoby AF, Fuller AF Jr, Thor AD et al. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the fallopian tube. Gynecol Oncol 1993,51:404-7.
  2. Kohler U, Horn LC, Marzotko E et al. Primary undifferentiated leiomyosarcoma of the fallopian tube Zentralbl Gynakol 1997;119:237-40.
  3. Friedrich M, Villena-Heinsen C, Bonkhoff H et al. Primary fallopian tube carcinoma. Report of a single case with review of the literature. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 1997;37:216-20.
  4. Lowton F, Lees C, Kelleher C. Primary cancer of the fallopian tube, In: John Studd (ed), Progress in Obstetrics and Gynecology New Delhi: B.I. Churchill Livingstone Pvt. Ltd. 1996;12:393-402.
  5. Ebert AD, Perez-Canto A, Schaller G et al. Stage I primary malignant mixed mullerian tumour of the fallopian tube. Report of a case with five-year survival after minimal surgery without adjuvant treatment. J Reprod Med 1998;43:598-600.
  • Download Aarticle
  • Email Aarticle
  • Print Article
  • Whatsapp Article