Purpose of Study To evaluate the knowledge, attitude and perception of HIV/AIDS among antenatal women and to correlate them with their socio-demographic profile.
Methods We conducted this study on 400 pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic of our hospital for the first time irrespective of their period of gestation, age and parity. All the participants were interviewed with the help of a predesigned questionnaire which included their socio-demographic details and questions to assess their knowledge and attitude toward HIV/AIDS. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 and expressed in the form of percentage, frequency distribution, mean, standard deviation and p value.
Results Antenatal women of the study population were having unsatisfactory knowledge about HIV/AIDS and prevention of MTCT. 26% women were totally unaware of any entity like HIV. 44% participants did not know the most common way of spread of HIV. Only half of the subjects knew the correct preventive measures for HIV/AIDS. 54% knew about MTCT, but only 24% knew about its transmission through breast milk. Knowledge and attitude was found to be significantly improving with socioeconomic status.
Conclusion Indian antenatal women have poor awareness and wrong perception about HIV/AIDS and its mother to child transmission (MTCT). Targeted educational interventions can be formulated to increase awareness among antenatal women about prevention of vertical transmission of HIV.
Keywords : HIV/AIDS , Antenatal women , Knowledge , Attitude , Mother to child transmission (MTCT) , Cross-sectional study
HIV/AIDS is a major global health issue. In 2018, approximately 37.9 million people were living with HIV. The global prevalence of HIV was 0.8% among adults [1, 2]. India has a population of 1.34 billion people which is the second largest in the world [3]. Despite being home to the world’s third largest population affected with epidemic of HIV/AIDS, India has low HIV prevalence [4]. According to UNAIDS, 2.1 million Indians were suffering from HIV in 2017 [1]. In 2015, NACO reported that HIV prevalence among adult population is 0.26% and 0.22% among females [5]. Antenatal women could play a very important role in prevention of vertical transmission if they have adequate knowledge about HIV and its preventive practices. Hence, the purpose of this study is to assess the knowledge, attitude and perception of antenatal women toward HIV/AIDS and to correlate it with their socio-demographic profile so that effective plans can be formulated to educate and increase awareness about HIV and its preventive practices. This will definitely help in prevention of maternal to child transmission.
Our study was a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study conducted on pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in a tertiary care center of northern India. The study was ethically approved by the institutional ethical committee of BPS GMC (W), Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana (Registration No.–BPSGMCW/RC 421/IEC/19). Ante natal women were recruited by simple random sampling technique. The sample size was calculated to be 396 using master 2.0 software considering this population with expected probability of awareness as 50% at confidence level 95%, acceptable error 5% and non-response rate 5%. We interviewed 400 antenatal women after written informed consent and explaining them that non-participation will not affect their antenatal care and treatment. Consent was taken by participants or their legally authorized representative in case of illiterate participants. Pregnant women attending antenatal clinic for the first time and willing to participate were included in the study irrespective of their period of gestation, age and parity. Those who were sick to communicate and not willing to participate were excluded. All the participants were interviewed with the help of a predesigned questionnaire which comprised of two sections. First section included the sociodemographic details of the participants like age, education, occupation, marital status, parity, and they are classified in different socioeconomic status (SES) according to modified Kuppuswamy scale. Second section included questions to assess their knowledge and attitude toward HIV/AIDS.
Data were analyzed using Microsoft excel 2013 and SPSS version 22. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative variables and were expressed as mean, standard deviation or frequencies and percentages. For comparing categorical data, Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was carried out as appropriate. For all statistical tests, P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Women who participated in our study were between the age group of 18 to 43 years with mean age of 24.60 ± 4.01 years. All of them were married. Majority of population (68.5%) belonged to rural area. 91.5% were housewives. The sociodemographic details of the participants are tabulated in Table 1.
Among all the participants, only 296 (74%) women had
heard about HIV and rest 26% percent were totally unaware
of any entity like HIV. Media was the most common source
of information followed by hospital, school and friends.
Participants were asked about their belief on various possible
routes of transmission of HIV. Only 54% women knew
about MTCT, and 24% knew about its transmission through
breast milk. Sixty-four percent women knew about the
sexual route of its transmission, 55% knew that it could be
transmitted through needles, and 48% knew about its transmission
through blood transfusion. It also became evident
that approximately 20% women have variable myths about
the transmission of HIV like it spreads by shaking hands,
kissing, mosquito bite, sharing utensils, toilet, etc.
Out of all the participants, 44% did not know the most
common way of spread of HIV and 45% mentioned sexual
contact as the most common mode of spread.
Knowledge about HIV in antenatal women was evaluated
using various questions as demonstrated in Table 2. Only
17% women knew that HIV and AIDS are not same and
63% knew the correct place for HIV testing. Only half of
the subjects knew the correct preventive measures for HIV/
AIDS. Approximately 75% of our participants were unaware
or had incorrect knowledge about the vulnerable groups for
HIV/AIDS.
Participants were also interviewed about their attitude and
perception for HIV/AIDS. Four women were already HIV positive. Attitude of majority of women toward HIV was
found to be negative in our study as majority of them (74%)
denied when they were asked if they could get HIV. Fiftyeight
percent thought that they could not get HIV as they are
practicing monogamy and their partners are unaffected. Others
had variable reason for this belief like no needle injuries
or blood transfusion in past or that they are healthy or no
family member is affected, etc. Fifty-seven percent of the
participants were interested in knowing their HIV status to
remain healthy by early diagnosis and treatment. Rest did
not find any need of getting tested for HIV as they were
practicing monogamy and were healthy. When participants
were enquired about the precautionary measures they should
take while taking care of a HIV-infected family member only
16% knew the right ways. Thirty-two percent women of our
study did not want to disclose their HIV status if positive due
to the fear of social seclusion and defamation which shows
that still HIV is a social taboo. This can only be extracted
out by education and awareness. Thirty-one percent antenatal
women did not consider HIV testing important during
pregnancy.
When we studied the proportion of participants who have
heard of HIV/AIDS according to age group we found that
among the participants below the age of 20 years only 31%
have heard of HIV/AIDS, while this proportion was 71% in
20–24 year age group, 83% in 25–29 year age group, 79% in
30–35 year age group, and 50% in participants of > 35 years
of age.
We also correlated the knowledge of participants with
their mean age, education, residential status as demonstrated
in Table 3.
The mean age of participants who had good knowledge
about HIV/AIDS and MTCT was significantly more than
the participants with poor knowledge. Knowledge correlated with education by calculating percentage of participants
with different educational status having good knowledge. P
value was calculated by comparing knowledge of all literate
women with illiterate ones, and it was found to be significant
(< 0.05). It is evident from Table 3 that knowledge improved
with educational status. Knowledge of urban population is
significantly more than rural population (P value is calculated
according to percentage distribution).
Knowledge about HIV/AIDS also improved with socio
economic status as depicted in Fig. 1.
We found in our study that attitude toward HIV/AIDS
is changing with educational and residential status. The
percentage of literate participants with positive attitude
is significantly more than the illiterate participants (P
value < 0.05). Percentage of urban population with good
attitude toward HIV is significantly more than rural population
(P value < 0.05). If we see the percentage distribution
of participants according to different socio economic status
it is evident that attitude toward HIV/AIDS and MTCT is
improving with socio economic status as depicted in Fig. 2.
HIV/AIDS is no longer restricted to high-risk behavior groups. Epidemic is spreading rapidly among antenatal women. Women of childbearing age are a very vulnerable category because of their low status in society, ignorance about safe sex practices and little influence on their husband’s behavior. That is why knowledge and awareness about HIV is very important among these women. They should know how to protect themselves and their babies from this disease. But still there is a barrier of embarrassment, shyness and sociocultural beliefs associated with Table 2 Knowledge regarding HIV/AIDS among study participants Questions Response of participants Yes No Do not know HIV and AIDS are same? 110 (27.5%) 70 (17.5%) 220 (55%) Do you know about the symptoms? 48 (12%) 152 (38%) 200 (50%) Can HIV be appreciated by look of patient? 8 (2%) 244 (61%) 148(37%) HIV/ AIDS can be cured? 164 (41%) 92(23.3%) 144 (36%) Do you know where HIV testing is done? 255 (63.7%) 2 (0.5%) 143 (35.8%) Preventive measure against infection includes? Single partner 220 (55%) 32 (8%) 148 (37%) Condom use 218 (54.5%) 20 (5%) 162 (40.5%) Use of sterile needles 236 (59%) 12 (3%) 152 (38%) Blood screening 184 (46%) 24 (6%) 192(48%) Avoiding Breastfeeding 130 (32.5%) 116(29%) 154(38.5%) No physical contact 114 (28.5%) 158 (39.5%) 128 (32%) No smoking and drinking alcohol 70 (17.5%) 162 (40.5%) 168 (42%) Abstinence 70 (17.5%) 128 (32%) 202 (50.5%) sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV/AIDS that need to be overcome. With increasing HIV infection among antenatal women, pediatric AIDS has become an important public health problem. [5]. Large proportion of HIV-infected antenatal women are still unaware of their HIV status. To overcome this, Center for disease control and prevention (CDC) and ACOG issued recommendation for universal screening of HIV [6, 7]. According to National family health survey (NFHS) of Haryana (2015–16), only 18.5 percent of antenatal women were tested for HIV in last five years [8]. Awareness about HIV among antenatal women will definitely help in the reduction of vertical transmission, but implementation of any preventive strategy for MTCT needs the assessment of existing knowledge and attitude of antenatal women toward HIV/AIDS.
Few studies were conducted in India to assess the knowledge
and attitude of antenatal women regarding HIV/AIDS
and concluded that the level of awareness and knowledge
of HIV/AIDS among antenatal women seems to be superficial
and more education about MTCT is needed which is in
agreement to results of our study [9, 10]. We also compared
our results with other two studies done in Ethiopia and China
and found that they also have low level of knowledge about
MTCT [11, 12]. Hence, there is a worldwide need of taking
steps to increase knowledge on MTCT.
In our study, though women showed positive attitude
toward screening and disclosure of HIV/AIDS, it does not seem to be an honest response. Majority of them agreed
for routine HIV testing in antenatal women, but according
to NFHS-4 (2015–16) of Haryana only 18.5 percent of
antenatal women were tested for HIV in last five years. [8]
Seventy-three percent women in our study were ready to take
care of HIV-infected family member but when four already
HIV-infected women of our study were asked that if they are
being taking care of by their family members their response
was “not really.” The stigma of getting HIV by touch or close
vicinity still exists in the society.
Media was the most common source of knowledge about
HIV/AIDS among antenatal women in our study similar to
many other studies [10, 13]. As people are more attracted
and influenced by media, its use should be further encouraged
for making people aware and educated about HIV/
AIDS. The contribution of health personnel and schools
in educating women about HIV is comparatively less. So
health workers should be encouraged for not missing any
opportunity to educate antenatal women regarding HIV/
AIDS during antenatal health visits. Schools should also
be encouraged to include education about HIV in their curriculum.
Friends and family being the least common source
of information shows HIV is still a taboo in society.
HIV/AIDS has long been viewed as an urban disease, but
this is no longer true. It has been spreading faster and aggressively
in rural areas. [14] This could be due to inadequate
HIV surveillance mechanisms, poor health infrastructure,
less sensitization and awareness about HIV/AIDS among
rural population as supported by our study.
Our study reflected the unsatisfactory knowledge and
negative attitude of antenatal women of Haryana toward
HIV/AIDS, but it also supported the fact that they can be
improved with their educational and socioeconomic status.
Women are ready to take care of their HIV-infected family members but do not know the right precautions which can
decrease its spread. So education about HIV/AIDS becomes
very necessary.
Our study is the first study of its kind done on antenatal
population of northern India. We have highlighted the need
for awareness of maternal to child transmission of HIV.
Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest among the authors.
Ethical Approval Ethical approval for study involving human participants have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
1. UNAIDS Global HIV & AIDS statistics 2019 fact sheet [Internet]. Share-Net International. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 27]. Available from: https:// share- netin terna tional. org/ unaids- global- hiv- aidsstati stics- 2019- fact- sheet/ UNAIDS.
2. HIV and AIDS estimate-Global Factsheet [Internet]. Unaids. org. 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 27]. Available from: http:// aidsi nfo. unaids. org/.
3. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision [Internet]. Department of economic and social affairs, population division (UN). Un.org.2017 [cited 2020 Nov 27]; 2017 p.1–19. Available from: https:// www. un. org/ devel opment/ desa/ publi catio ns/ worldpopul ation- prosp ects- the- 2017- revis ion. html
4. The World Fact book 2018-Central Intelligence Agency (US) [Internet]. Cia.gov. 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 27]. Available from: https:// www. cia. gov/ libra ry/ publi catio ns/ downl oad/ downl oad- 2018/ index. html.
5. National Aids Control Organization (NACO), Annual report 2016–17; Chapter 24 p. 338–407 [Internet]. Naco.gov.in. 2017 [cited 2020 Nov 27]. Available from: http:// naco. gov. in/ docum ents/ annual- repor ts.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Surveillance Report, 2017; vol.29 [Internet]. Cdc.gov.2018 [cited 2020 Nov 27]. http:// www. cdc. gov/ hiv/ libra ry/ repor ts/ hiv- surve illan ce. html.
7. American college of obstetricians and gynecologists. Committee opinion no: 635: Prenatal and perinatal human immunodeficiency virus testing: expanded recommendations. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(6):1544–7. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ 01. AOG. 00004 66370. 86393. d2 (PMID: 26000543).
8. Ministry of health and family welfare, India. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015–16 [Internet]. International institute of population sciences. Rchiips.org. Dec 2017 [cited 2020 Nov 27]. Available from: http:// rchii ps. org/ nfhs/ pdf/ NFHS4/ GJ_ FactS heet. pdf.
9. Jahan U, Verma K, Gupta S, et al. Awareness, knowledge and attitude of pregnant women towards HIV/AIDS in tertiary care hospital: a community based study. Int J Adv Res. 2017;5(8):494–500.
10. Lucksom PG, Upadhya R, Kharka L, et al. KAP Study on HIV/ AIDS among antenatal women attending central referral hospital of North East India. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66(Suppl 1):55–9. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13224- 015- 0767-9.
11. Alemu YM, Habtewold TD, Alemu SM, et al. Mother’s knowledge on prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, Ethiopia: A cross sectional study. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2018 Sep 11 [cited 2020 Nov 24];13(9):e0203043. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 02030 43. PMID: 30204752; PMCID: PMC6133350. Available from: https://doi.org/https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 02030 43.
12. Xueref S, Holianjavony J, Capart H, et al. Knowledge and attitudes about HIV-AIDS in a pregnant women population in Southwestern Madagascar. J Hum Virol Retrovirology. 2018;6(3):69–79.
13. Gupta M, Mahajan VK, Chauhan PS, Mehta KS, Rawat R, Shiny TN. Knowledge, attitude and perception of disease among persons living with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: A study from a tertiary care center in North India. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2016;37:173–7. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4103/ 0253- 7184. 185500.
14. Weissman S, Duffus WA, Iyer M, et al. Rural-urban differences in HIV viral loads and progression to AIDS among new HIV cases. South Med J. 2015;108(3):180–8. https:// doi. org/ 10. 14423/ SMJ. 00000 00000 000255 (PMID: 25772053).