The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India
did-you-know
Clinical Pearls of JOGI SERIES OF WEBINARS Click her to view
VOL. 73 NUMBER 2 March-April  2023

Community Perspective of Male Involvement in Maternal Health Care in Uttarakhand, India: A Qualitative Study

Pawna Kaushal1 · Meenakshi Khapre1 · Amity Das1 · Ranjeeta Kumari1 · Megha Sharma1

Pawna Kaushal BDS, MPH Student, Department of Community and Family Medicine All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh; Meenakshi Khapre MD, Associate Professor, Department of Community and Family Medicine All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh; Amity Das BDS, MPH Student, Department of Community and Family Medicine All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh; Ranjeeta Kumari MD, Additional Professor, Department of Community and Family Medicine All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh; Megha Sharma BDS, MPH Student, Department of Community and Family Medicine All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh.

Pawna Kaushal pawnakaushal@gmail.com

1 Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India

  • Download Article
  • Email Article
  • Print Article
  • Whatsapp Article

Background
Due to the significant role of male in decision making in India, they may decide if, when and where a woman may access antenatal, delivery and postnatal care; and whether or not to provide financial resources to travel to these services. Men's involvement in maternity care is recognized as a key strategy in improving maternal health and accelerating the reduction of maternal mortality. This study explores key components and challenges to male involvement in maternal health care (MHC).

Methods
Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with a purposive sample of the community key stakeholders from the field practice area of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, (AIIMS) Rishikesh from October 2020 to January 2021. Manual thematic analysis with a semantic approach was used for the data analysis. Themes were prioritized using Participatory rural appraisal (PRA) technique.

Results
Twenty-three participants represented the heterogeneous group of key stakeholders. Stakeholders identified the need for improved awareness regarding MHC services among men. Husband involvement is affected by availability (work stations at different places), literacy, gender-based work domain and social cultures, finances and health facility environment.

Four major themes were identified: Male involvement in antenatal, intranatal; postnatal care; and barriers to male involvement in MHC. Sub-themes under male involvement in antenatal care; intranatal care; and postnatal care were further prioritized via PRA as ‘very important’; ‘important’ and ‘not so important’ and scores were given as 3, 2 and 1 respectively.

Conclusions
Male involvement is a key strategy to improve pregnancy outcome; however, different challenges exist in their involvement in the maternal health care. Current study helped to contextualize the perception regarding importance of male involvement in MHC; and the situation of study area in order to understand social and cultural factors that shape the behavior and practices of men in relation to their involvement.

Keywords : Perception · Male involvement · Maternal health care · Husbands’ involvement · MHC

Abbreviations
ANC Antenatal care

ANM Auxiliary Nurse Midwife

ASHA Accredited Social Health Activist

AWW Anganwadi worker

FGD Focus group discussion

MHC Maternal health care

MMR Maternal mortality ratio

PNC Postnatal care

PRA Participatory rural appraisal

WHO World Health Organization

The survival and well-being of mothers are not only important in their own right but also an important aspect of the development of any country in terms of increasing equity and reducing poverty; and solving large broader, economic, social and developmental challenges. To ensure safe motherhood, strengthening MHC services is very important at every stage [1, 2]. Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is one of the important indicators of the quality of MHC services. According to the global estimate of the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2017, MMR was 211 per 100,000 live births [1], and in India, MMR was 113 per 100,000 live births in indices 2016–18 [1, 3].
Male involvement in MHC has been recognized as a key strategy in improving maternal health and accelerating reduction of maternal mortality globally [4–6]. In a meta-analysis of Yargawa J, male involvement is associated with improved maternal health outcomes in developing countries [7]. But maternal health-related problems have largely been perceived and treated purely as a women's role, and men have been exclusively excluded from MHC services. Husband has a decisive role in, when and where a woman may access MHC services and to provide financial resources to travel for these services [8, 9].

According to India’s National Health and Family Survey- IV, 68.2% of men were present with their wives during any ANC visit and 17.8% men were not present during any ANC visit [10]. In Uttarakhand, 66.5% of men accompanied their wives on any ANC visit [11]. Several studies concerning male partners' involvement in the ANC in India showed varied results ranging from 22 to 75.9% [12–15]. Men who were not present during ANC visits thought that their attendance was unnecessary [10].

Low (35%, 44%, and 20%) male involvement is reported during antenatal care, delivery, and postnatal care services, respectively, in a study of Ghana [8]. In a Nigerian study, 53.2% of the male respondents had good knowledge of emergency obstetric conditions (danger signs), and 97.4% encouraged their wives to attend antenatal clinic [16]. In Central Tanzania study, 53.9% men were involved in ANC visits [9]. Inconsistent results were reported by other studies [17–20].

Till now in India, the main focus has only been given to men’s involvement in ANC services utilization. Other components like the husband's role at home, during delivery, and how women feel during pregnancy are understudied in India. Males themselves are not clear about the importance of their role in MHC. To best of our knowledge, in India, no scale is available to measure male involvement in MHC. Also, there is a need to understand cultural, socio-economic, and facility-based barriers to male involvement and how it can help to improve male involvement in MHC. This study aimed to 1. Explore the community perspective of key components and challenges; 2. Develop a scale to measure male involvement in MHC in Dehradun district, Uttarakhand, India.

Declarations

Competing Interests All authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Ethical Approval Ethical approval from Institutional Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh (AIIMS/IEC/20/808) was sought before the conduct of study. Written consent from the participants was obtained after informing them purpose of study; voluntary participation; and no harm to the participant. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. To protect the confidentiality of participants no names or positions have been reported in the manuscript.

  1.  WHO. Documents on maternal health. WHO. World health organization. http:// www. who. int/ mater nal_ child_ adole scent/ docum ents/ mothe rs/ en/.
  2. NHM. Annual_Report-Mohfw.pdf Page No. 51. https:// nhm. gov. in/ images/ pdf/ media/ publi cation/ Annual_ Report- Mohfw. pdf.
  3. UNICEF. Maternal health. https:// www. unicef. org/ india/ what- wedo/ mater nal- health.
  4. Sharma V, Leight J, Giroux N, et al. That’s a woman’s problem: a qualitative analysis to understand male involvement in maternal and newborn health in Jigawa state, northern Nigeria. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):143.
  5. Gibore NS, Ezekiel MJ, Meremo A, et al. Determinants of men’s involvement in maternity care in Dodoma Region, Central Tanzania. J Pregnancy. 2019;2019:e7637124.
  6. Chakrabarti S, Sarkar D. Awareness and involvement of male spouse in various aspects of antenatal care: observation in a rural area of West Bengal. Int J Commun Med Public Health. 2017;4:1179–82. 
  7. Yargawa J, Leonardi-Bee J. Male involvement and maternal health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2015;69(6):604–12. 
  8. Craymah JP, Oppong RK, Tuoyire DA. Male involvement in maternal health care at anomabo, Central Region Ghana. Int J Reprod Med. 2017;2017:2929013. 
  9. Gibore NS, Bali TAL, Kibusi SM. Factors influencing men’s involvement in antenatal care services: a cross-sectional study in a low resource setting, Central Tanzania. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):52. 
  10. Rchiips.org NFHS-4 India report 60263_National_Report_Full file 05-07-2018 WEB.pdf Page No. 222. 2015–16. 2021. http:// rchii ps. org/ nfhs/ NFHS- 4Repo rt. shtml. 
  11. Rchips.org NFHS-4 Uttrakhand state report 24-04-2018.indd Page No. 15. 2015–1. 2021. http:// rchii ps. org/ nfhs/ NFHS- 4Repo rts/ Uttar akhand. pdf.
  12. Kushwah SS, Dubey D, Singh G, et al. Status of birth preparedness and complication readiness in Rewa District of Madhya Pradesh. Indian J Public Health. 2009;53(3):128–32 (PMID: 20108874).
  13. Chattopadhyay A. Men in maternal care: evidence from India. J Biosoc Sci. 2012;44(2):129–53. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S0021 93201 10005 02. 
  14. Kalliath JD, Johnson AR, Pinto P, et al. Awareness, attitude, participation and use of technology in birth preparedness and complication readiness among husbands of women availing obstetric care at a rural maternity hospital in South Karnataka. Int J Commun Med Public Health. 2019;6:3303–9. 
  15. Walia M, Mittal A, Kumar D. Male participation in reproductive health care of women and factors associated with interpersonal relationship: a cross-sectional study in a rural community of Ambala District in Haryana. Indian J Public Health. 2021;65:178–84.
  16. Odimegwu C, Adewuyi A, Odebiyi T, et al. Men’s role in emergency obstetric care in Osun State of Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2005;1:59–71. 
  17. Iliyasu Z, Abubakar IS, Galadanci HS, et al. Birth preparedness, complication readiness and fathers’ participation in maternity care in a northern Nigerian community. African J Reproduct Health. 2010;14(1):1. 
  18. Sapkota S, Kobayashi T, Takase M. Women’s experience of giving birth with their husband’s support in Nepal. Br J Midwifery. 2011;19(7):426–32. 
  19. Singh D, Lample M, Earnest J. The involvement of men in maternal health care: cross-sectional, pilot case studies from Maligita and Kibibi Uganda. Reproduct health. 2014;11(1):1–8.
  20. Olayemi O, Bello FA, Aimakhu CO, et al. Male participation in pregnancy and delivery in Nigeria: a survey of antenatal attendees. J Biosoc Sci. 2009;41(4):493–503.
  21. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: BMJ Publishing Group; 2000. 
  22. Calder BJ. Focus groups and the nature of qualitative marketing research. J Market Res14 (Aug). 1977;14:353–64.
  23. Chamber R. Rural appraisal: rapid, relaxed and participatory. Institute of Development Studies, Discussion Papers 311. Brighton: IDS; 1992. https:// www. ids. ac. uk/ downl oad. php? file= files/ Dp311. pdf
  24. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. 
  25. Centre for Health and Social Justice. Annual_report-2008-09. 2021. http:// www. chsj. org/ uploa ds/1/ 0/2/ 1/ 10215 849/ annual_ report- 2008- 09. 
  26. Maluka SO, Peneza AK. Perceptions on male involvement in pregnancy and childbirth in Masasi District, Tanzania: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):1–7.
  27. Aborigo RA, Reidpath DD, Oduro AR, et al. Male involvement in maternal health: perspectives of opinion leaders. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:1. 
  28. Saah FI, Tarkang EE, Komesuor J, et al. Involvement of male partners in skilled birth care in the North Dayi District, Ghana. Int J Reproduct Med. 2019;2019:e2852861. 
  29. EBCOG Scientific Committee. The public health importance of antenatal care. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2015;7(1):5–6 (PMID: 25897366; PMCID: PMC4402443). 
  30. Andersen R, Newman JF. Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Meml Fund Q Health Soc. 1973;1:95–124.
  31. Rosenstock IM. People use health services. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):1.
  32. Mahiti GR, Mbekenga CK, Kiwara AD, et al. Perceptions about the cultural practices of male partners during postpartum care in rural Tanzania: a qualitative study. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1361184. 
  33. Sarvar R, Sonavane R. Male involvement in antenatal and natal care practices of their partners – a community-based study in rural area of North Karnataka. Public Health Rev Int J Public Health Res. 2018;5(2):92–8. 
  34. Ongolly FK, Bukachi SA. Barriers to men’s involvement in antenatal and postnatal care in Butula, western Kenya. African J Prim Health Care Family Med. 2019;11(1):1–7.
  35. Mullany BC. Barriers to and attitudes towards promoting husbands’ involvement in maternal health in Katmandu Nepal. Soc Sci Med 1982. 2006;62(11):2798–809.
  36. Ganle JK, Dery I. What men don’t know can hurt women’s health: a qualitative study of the barriers to and opportunities for men’s involvement in maternal healthcare in Ghana. Reproduct health. 2015;12(1):1–3.
  • Download Aarticle
  • Email Aarticle
  • Print Article
  • Whatsapp Article