The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India
did-you-know
Clinical Pearls of JOGI SERIES OF WEBINARS Click her to view
VOL. 65 NUMBER 2 March-April  2015

Pulseless and Ambulatory Pregnant Woman: An Obstetric and Medical Challenge

Chourasia Uma ● Modi Jyoti Nath ● Jain Manisha ● Biswas Rakesh

Chourasia U. [drumahchourasia@gmail.com], Assistant Professor ● Modi J. N., Professor and Head , Jain M., Assistant Professor
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, People’s College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bhanpur, Bhopal 462037, India

Biswas R.
Professor, Department of Medicine, People’s College of Medical Sciences, and Research Centre, Bhanpur, Bhopal, India

  • Download Article
  • Email Article
  • Print Article
  • Whatsapp Article

About the Author


Uma Chourasia is Assistant Professor at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peoples College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Peoples University, Bhopal. She received her M.D. from Indira Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur University in 2007. She is deeply involved in academics of Undergraduate and Postgraduate students. She has keen interest in clinical work and has published few of the rare cases in speciality journals. She has done her research on mifepristone in preinduction cervical ripening.

She worked as Senior Resident at PCMS for three years following which she served at Libyan British Medical and Research Center, Tripoli, Libya as Consultant Obstetrician and Gynecologist. She is a regular participant of Conferences and CME, has presented Posters at International and National Conferences.

Introduction

Takayasu’s arteritis is a chronic inflammatory arteriopathy affecting large vessels predominantly the aorta and its main branches [1, 2]. It is a rare disease, relatively more common in Japan, India, Asia and Mexico [3]. It has a higher preponderance for women in reproductive age groups, in the 2nd and the 3rd decades of life [4–6]. The etiology remains speculative, but the current literature suggests autoimmune basis [2, 7, 8]. The disease can vary remarkably in terms of sites of constrictions of blood vessels and hence the clinical presentation [9, 10]. Optimal management of pregnancy in this condition cannot be too standardized or generalized due to rarity and variation in disease profile. Therefore, experience sharing forms an important aspect of learning to manage such patients. We share one such case here and the lessons we learnt from it.

Case Report

A second gravida (G2P1L0), aged 26 years, visited in Antenatal clinic at 8 weeks of pregnancy. Her first pregnancy had ended in intrauterine demise in the 7th month (no details available). On examination, she was short with medium built (Ht-150 cm, Wt-47 kg, BMI-21.7 kg/m). Her bilateral radial pulses were not palpable, and her BP could not be recorded in either arm by auscultatory method using the aneroid BP instrument in the Antenatal clinic. Patient was admitted for complete evaluation. The BP taken using a digital manometer (NIBP) was very high (170/100–210/130) with a wide variation in the readings in the four limbs. Aortic bruit could be heard in the midline over abdomen. No carotid bruit was found. The clinical suspicion of aortoarteritis was confirmed by Doppler study (Figs 1–3). She was started on folic acid, antihypertensives (alphamethyldopa 250 mg TDS and labetalol 50 mg BD) and ecosprin 75 mg OD. Regular follow up was advised fortnightly. At 25 weeks, she developed superimposed preeclampsia and also mild IUGR (lag of 3 weeks); Doppler study showed a high systolic/diastolic ratio in umbilical arteries. She was advised to stay hospitalized for further evaluation and monitoring, but she left against medical advice. Patient reported back to the hospital at 29 weeks with decreased fetal movements.USG revealed severe IUGR (lag of 5 weeks) with moderate oligohydramnios. Fetal Doppler showed absent diastolic flow in umbilical arteries and preferential flow in middle cerebral arteries. Patient was taken for emergency LSCS on the same day. A preterm female baby weighing 660 g was born, was kept in NICU and fortunately did not require significant ventilatory support (only BUBBLE C PAP for 48 h). The patient recovered well postoperatively. Hypertension persisted beyond 6 weeks, patient continues to be on two antihypertensive medications: telmisartan 40 mg OD and Amlodipine 5 mg BD. Patient was advised CT Angiography for further evaluation of disease, which she did not comply with for financial reasons.


Discussion

TA is a rare, chronic, giant cell vasculitis which primarily involves the aorta, its main branches, and coronary and pulmonary arteries. The disease causes various clinical conditions such as arm claudication, decrease artery pulses, visual loss, stroke, aortic regurgitation, HT, and CCF. Clinical presentation can be varying depending on site or level of vessel stenosis or occlusion [9, 10].

According to new angiographic classification of TA, five types of disease can be identified [11]. The presence of three or more of these criteria demonstrates a sensitivity of 90.5 % and specificity of 97.5 %.


Type Vessel involvement
Type I Branches from the aortic arch
Type IIa Ascending aorta, aortic arch, and its branches
Type IIb Ascending aorta, aortic arch and its branches, and thoracic
descending aorta
Type III Thoracic descending aorta, abdominal aorta and/or renal
arteries
Type IV Abdominal aorta and/or renal arteries
Type V Combined features of types IIb and IV


Types I and II of TA are commonly symptomatic. Patients with TA types III, IV, and V may remain asymptomatic and hence undiagnosed. Being type IV TA, the reported case remained undiagnosed till her second pregnancy. The diagnosis was picked up through meticulous general examination.

Earlier literature has suggested that most of the pregnant patient with TA reached successfully till term and had vaginal deliveries with fair fetal outcome. Those patients were mostly of types I and II TA [12, 13]. Incidences of secondary HT and IUGR were low in those patients. Poor perinatal outcome was usually seen in types III, IV, and V TA. Common complications seen were secondary HT, pre eclampsia, and IUGR. Operative interventions and NICU admissions were more common in those patients [14, 15]. Involvement of abdominal aorta and renal vessels could be the cause for higher incidences of IUGR and poor perinatal outcome. Course of pregnancy and fetal prognosis may not correlate with severity of disease per se but are directly dependent on site of involvement of vessels. Therefore, a careful thought has to be given to the type of the disease while studying literature for patient management.

Another learning point from literature as well as this patient was that patient diagnosed for the first time during pregnancy may have unpredictable complications even if the disease appears to be stable. So, alertness at all times with preparation of timely intervention is prudent.

References

  1. Wilke WS. Large vessel vasculitis (gaint cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis). Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1997;11:285–313.
  2. Numano F. Hereditary factors of Takayasu arteritis. Heart Vessels. 1992;7:68–72.
  3. Numano F, Okawara M, Inomata H, et al. Takayasu’s arteritis. The Lancet. 2000;356:1023–5.
  4. Sharma BK, Sagar S, Chugh KS, et al. Spectrum of renovascular hypertension in the young in North India: a hospital based study on occurrence and clinical features. Angiology. 1985;36:370–8.
  5. Jain S, Kumari S, Ganguly NK, et al. Current status of Takayasu arteritis in India. Int J Cardiol. 1996;54:111–6.
  6. Koide K. Takayasu arteritis in Japan. Heart Vessels. 1992;7:48–54.
  7. Ueda H, Saito Y, Ito I, et al. Immunological studies of aortitis syndrome. Jpn Hear J. 1967;8:4–18.
  8. Kimura A, Kitamura H, Date Y, et al. Comprehensive analysis of HLA genes in Takayasu arteritis in Japan. Int J Cardiol. 1996;54:61–9.
  9. Sato EL, Hatta FS, Levy-Neto M, et al. Demographic, clinical, and angiographic data of patients with Takayasu arteritis in Brazil. Int J Cardiol. 1998;66:67–70.
  10. Mohamed AP, Michael LC, Mikhail E. A case of Takayasu arteritis causing subclavian steal and presenting syncope. J Emer Med. 2011;40:158–61.
  11. Moriwaki R, Noda M, Yajima M, et al. Clinical manifestations of Takayasu arteritis in India and Japan-new classification of angiographic findings. Angiology. 1997;48:369–79.
  12. Suri V, Aggrawal N, Keepanasseril A, et al. Pregnancy and Takayasu arteritis. A single centre experience from North India. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36:519–24.
  13. Raliton A, Allen DG. Takayasu arteritis in pregnancy. S Afr Med J. 1988;73:123.
  14. Sharma BK, Jain S, Vashistha K. Outcome of pregnancy in Takayasu’s arteritis. Int J Cardiol. 2000;75:159–62.
  15. Dutta B, Pandey R, Darlong V, et al. Low-dose spinal anesthesia for a parturient with Takayasu’s arteritis undergoing emergency cesarean section. Singapore Med J. 2010;51:111–3.
  • Download Aarticle
  • Email Aarticle
  • Print Article
  • Whatsapp Article