The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India
did-you-know
Clinical Pearls of JOGI SERIES OF WEBINARS Click her to view
VOL. 64 NUMBER 6 November-December  2014

Uterine Arteriovenous Vascular Malformation Masked by Partial Molar Pregnancy: Diagnostic Challenge and Subsequent Embolic Treatment

Contractor Sohail • Chung Ryan • Donthireaddy Awani • Kumar Abhishek

Contractor S., Associate Professor, Vice Chair, Radiology,
Section Chief
Interventional Radiology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, University Hospital, Newark, NJ, USA

e-mail: contrasg@rutgers.edu

Chung R., BS  Donthireaddy A., BS
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA

Kumar A., Fellow
Interventional Radiology, Mt Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

  • Download Article
  • Email Article
  • Print Article
  • Whatsapp Article

About the Author


Sohail Contractor is currently an Associate Professor of Radiology at Rutgers Health Sciences University in Newark, NJ. He is also a Vice Chairman of radiology and Director of Interventional Radiology. He is trained in Internal Medicine, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and has been in practice since 1996 in the United States. He graduated from Grant Medical College, Mumbai, India. He has over 50 peer-reviewed publications and presentations at both national and international meetings and has been an invited faculty at major Interventional societal meetings in the US, Europe, and India. His chief practice involves tumor and malformation embolization, hepatobiliary diseases, and women’s health. He has also submitted a brief CV for further review.


Introduction

Uterine arteriovenous vascular malformations (UAVM) are uncommon and usually present in women of reproductive age. When these occur in a pregnant patient or in the immediate postpartum period, clinical presentation may overlap with several other entities such as retained products of conception (RPOC), postpartum endometritis, as well as gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) [1]. We present a case of a UAVM that presented with life-threatening vaginal bleeding several months after dilatation and curettage (D&C) of a molar pregnancy. The UAVM was diagnosed with ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and subsequently treated with transarterial embolization (TAE).

Case

Case reports are exempt from institutional review board approval at our institution. A 37-year-old G2P0020 female was referred with complaints of heavy vaginal bleeding for 1 week. She reported passing ‘‘pancake sized clots’’ and stated that she was changing her pad every 20 min. She also reported vaginal cramping and abdominal pain.

The patient’s first pregnancy resulted in a spontaneous abortion 2 years ago. Four months prior to presentation, she was diagnosed with a partial molar pregnancy based on US findings (Fig. 1) and a beta-hCG level of 262,000 IU/L. She underwent a D&C for treatment. Three months fol-lowing her discharge from the hospital, she presented with3 days of vaginal bleeding. During this hospital stay, thebleeding stopped, and she was managed expectantly anddischarged home. At this time, no imaging was done. Onemonth later, she presented to our institution with heavyvaginal bleeding, as described above.


On physical exam at the time of admission, she appearedpale and diaphoretic. Her abdomen was soft and there wasa palpable mass 5 cm inferior to the umbilicus. Her uteruswas 12 cm and anteverted. There was a moderate amountof dark red blood in the vaginal vault. Her beta-hCG hadtrended down from the time of her partial molar pregnancyto 2 IU/L. Her hemoglobin was 6.7 g/dL and she wastransfused with two units of packed red blood cells. An USof the pelvis showed a fluid-filled endometrial canal andseveral cystic structures within the uterus (Fig.2a). Thisfinding was similar to her US 2 months prior (Fig.1).However, on color Doppler interrogation, there was colorflow within these anechoic cystic spaces (Fig.2b). Spectralanalysis revealed a rapid arterial flow of up to 80 cm/s witha low resistance index (RI) of 0.23 (Fig.2c). Given thesefindings, a vascular malformation was suspected. MRI ofthe pelvis demonstrated an enlarged uterus with severalflow voids within the fundus and body of the uterus, con-sistent with a high-flow arteriovenous malformation(AVM) (Fig.3). The patient was managed conservatively with vaginal packing for 2 days, however, her bleeding persisted and she was referred for angiography and possible embolization.


A pelvic angiogram demonstrated a large AVM in the uterus supplied by both uterine arteries and multiple smaller feeding vessels with its nidus supplied mainly by the right uterine artery (Fig. 4a). Early venous filling of the right internal iliac vein was also seen (Fig. 4b). A 5F SOS Omni Selective Catheter (Angiodynamics, Latham, NY) was then used to select the right uterine artery. A 3F microcatheter (Renegade Hi-Flo, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) was then placed distally into the right uterine artery and into the nidus of the AVM. The vessel was then embolized with a 1:1 mixture of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA, TRUFILL , Miami Lakes, FL) and Ethiodol (Guerbet LLC, Bloomington, IN). 1.4 cc of embolic was used. Post-embolization angiogram demonstrated decreased flow to the AVM (Fig. 4c). Subsequently, the left uterine artery was selected using the 5F SOS catheter (Angiodynamics, Latham, NY) and the 3F microcatheter (Renegade Hi-Flo, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA). However, only a limited supply to the AVM from the left uterine artery was seen (Fig. 4d). This artery was embolized with 500–700 lm embospheres (Merit Medical, South Jordan, UT). One vial of the embolic mixed in 10 cc of Isovue 300 was used. Post-embolization aortogram demonstrated exclusion of flow to the AVM (Fig. 4e). The patient had no further episodes of vaginal bleeding postprocedure and did not require any additional transfusions. She was discharged on post-procedure day #3. She was seen in the gynecology clinic 3 months post-procedure with resumption of her normal menstrual cycles.

Discussion

Uterine arteriovenous vascular malformations (UAVMs) are uncommon gynecologic vascular lesions that often present as unexplained, intermittent, vaginal bleeding of sudden onset [2–5] occurring with or without pelvic pain or dyspareunia [4, 6]. The bleeding may be profuse, long lasting, and can lead to life-threatening hemorrhage. The resulting hemodynamic instability makes the diagnosis of UAVM an important consideration in any patient presenting with vaginal bleeding as prompt diagnosis and therapy are essential for favorable outcomes. These may occur as congenital lesions that grow with puberty or pregnancy, or they may develop as acquired lesions.

The development of acquired UAVMs often follows pregnancy or uterine trauma, such as D&C, pelvic surgery, endometrial and cervical carcinoma in situ, maternal diethylstilbestrol exposure, infection, RPOC, GTD, or choriocarcinoma [3, 7–10]. Typically, acquired AVMs consist of multiple small arteriovenous fistulas, while congenital AVMs have an intervening nidus with multiple feeding arteries and draining veins [2, 3]. In our case, imaging findings were consistent with a congenital AVM, and we hypothesize that the growth and subsequent bleeding of the AVM was a result of the hormonal variations in her molar pregnancy [11].

The true incidence of UAVM is unknown, although rough estimates have been reported with 3.4–4.5 % of women with abnormal premenopausal bleeding being diagnosed with a UAVM [12, 13]. While a UAVM can present at any age, they typically affect women of childbearing age and rarely occur in nulligravid women [7, 11].

The diagnosis of UAVM is challenging given the rarity of the condition and the nonspecific US findings of heterogeneous, anechoic spaces within the myometrium. Included in the differential diagnosis are RPOC, GTD [3, 5, 8, 14], hemangioma, varicosities, uterine malignancies [3, 5], subinvolution [5, 14], fluid-filled bowel loops, mulit-locular ovarian cysts, and hydrosalpinx [3]. The use of color Doppler with spectral analysis can characterize the grayscale findings further [8]. With UAVMs, continuous high flow throughout systole and diastole with systolic flows four to six times that of normal are demonstrated. Irregular spectral broadening of the waveform reflects increased turbulence. RI measurements are low, and mixing of arterial and venous waveforms is considered diagnostic. Waveforms of pelvic veins distal to the UAVM demonstrate pulsatile flow in contrast to normal monophasic flow [3]. High-flow arterial velocity with peak velocity values ranging from 40 to 96 cm/s and low RI values ranging from 0.25 to 0.55 are characteristic of UAVMs [7, 8]. If values within these ranges are found, it may give a more precise diagnosis of a UAVM. Like UAVMs, RPOC may also give a hypervascular appearance with turbulent flow on color Doppler imaging. However, beta-hCG levels may be used to distinguish pregnancy-related conditions (GTD, RPOC, and abnormal placentation) from the diagnosis of a UAVM [8].


Due to the similarity in appearance of molar pregnancies and UAVMs on US and color Doppler, it may be worthwhile to perform color Doppler with spectral analysis in these patients followed by angiography for a definitive diagnosis, particularly if they have a past history of a spontaneous abortion or other uterine trauma [7, 8]. In this particular case, we suspect that the molar pregnancy was masking the patient’s congenital UAVM, the growth of which was stimulated by molar-related hormonal fluctuations. In our case, the patient did not have color Doppler imaging at the time of her molar pregnancy or when she initially presented with vaginal bleeding. As a result, it is possible that the UAVM could have been diagnosed earlier if these imaging studies were performed. If a UAVM was in fact present, then earlier management options, such as an angiography with TAE could have been utilized. However, as angiography is an invasive procedure, it can be reserved for those with low beta-hCG levels and color Doppler and spectral analysis findings which correspond to a UAVM in patients with persistent and severe vaginal bleeding. In our case, the patient reported persistent vaginal bleeding despite a downward trending beta-hCG. This presentation coupled with her later US and color Doppler findings led us to investigate further with an MRI. Typical MR findings are a bulky uterus with absence of a defined mass and the presence of serpiginous and dilated vessels within myometrium or parametrium [1]. Given her history, the patient likely had growth of a congenital UAVM secondary to hormonal changes induced by her molar pregnancy.

Transarterial embolization (TAE) can be used to confirm the diagnosis angiographically and used to treat the UAVM. Embolization is the preferred treatment for UAVMs as it is effective, can be done without general anesthesia, and can maintain fertility [6, 7, 15]. Hysterectomy, once the treatment of choice, and the most definitive treatment, is now reserved for post-menopausal women or those who need emergent therapy for life-threatening hemorrhage [6] when TAE is unavailable [10], or when patient choice dictates it [9]. In summary, UAVM is a rare vascular lesion that can lead to life-threatening vaginal bleeding. A high index of suspicion for UAVM should be maintained in a patient presenting with unexplained profuse vaginal bleeding with a history of prior pregnancy or uterine trauma. US with color Doppler and spectral analysis, as well as MRI, can aid in the prompt diagnosis of this condition. Angiography, the gold standard for diagnosis, can bridge the gap between diagnosis and definitive treatment. The success of TAE in treating this lesion and in maintaining fertility has led to its ascendance as the treatment modality of choice.

Compliance with Ethical Requirements

The Institutional Review Board does not mandate approval for case reports such as this, thus this report meets the Ethical standards as stated in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. While a specific consent from the patient for this report was not obtained, our procedure consents obtained prior to each procedure state that we may use images such as the ones here for teaching and illustrative purposes. All patient identifiers in the report and images have been removed.

References

  1. Alessandrino F, Di Silverio E, Moramarco LP. Uterine arteriovenous malformation. J Ultrasound. 2013;16(1):41–4.
  2. Kwon JH, Kim GS. Obstetric iatrogenic arterial injuries of the uterus: diagnosis with US and treatment with transcatheter arterial embolization. Radiographics. 2002;22(1):35–46.
  3. Grivell RM, Reid KM, Mellor A. Uterine arteriovenous malformations: a review of the current literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60(11):761–7.
  4. Ginsberg NA, Hammer R, Parihk S, et al. Arteriovenous malformation of the uterus associated with a missed abortion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994;4(3):235–7.
  5. Kim TH, Lee HH. Presenting features of women with uterine arteriovenous malformations. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2330e7–10.
  6. Delotte J, Chevallier P, Benoit B, et al. Pregnancy after embolization therapy for uterine arteriovenous malformation. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(1):228.
  7. Peitsidis P, Manolakos E, Tsekoura V, et al. Uterine arteriovenous malformations induced after diagnostic curettage: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(5):1137–51.
  8. Mungen E. Vascular abnormalities of the uterus: have we recently over-diagnosed them? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(6):529–31.
  9. Yang PY, Hsu JC, Yeh GP, et al. Sonographic features of uterine arteriovenous malformations: two and three dimensional findings. J Med Ultrasound. 2009;17(3):173–7.
  10. Halder A, Pati S, Mukherjee G, et al. An invasive mole presenting with large arteriovenous malformation. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012;62(1):76–8.
  11. Hoffman MK, Meilstrup JW, Shackelford DP, et al. Arteriovenous malformations of the uterus: an uncommon cause of vaginal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1997;52(12):736–40.
  12. O’Brien P, Neyastani A, Buckley AR, et al. Uterine arteriovenous malformations: from diagnosis to treatment. J Ultrasound Med. 2006:25(11):1387-92; quiz 1394-5.
  13. Timmerman D, van den Bosch T, Peeraer K, et al. Vascular malformations in the uterus: ultrasonographic diagnosis and conservative management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000;92(1):171–8.
  14. Eling R, Kent A, Robertson M. Pregnancy after uterine arteriovenous malformation—case series and literature review. Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2012;15(3):87–96.
  15. Garner EI, Meyerovitz M, Goldstein DP, et al. Successful term pregnancy after selective arterial embolization of symptomatic arteriovenous malformation in the setting of gestational trophoblastic tumor. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88(1):69–72.
  • Download Aarticle
  • Email Aarticle
  • Print Article
  • Whatsapp Article